robinbloke (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
robinbloke) wrote2004-09-30 01:27 am
robinbloke) wrote2004-09-30 01:27 am
Musings from a synaptic breakpoint
Free will is one of the given basic assumptions that most1 people assume is part of this great thing we have call life, existence and everything. This often encompasses a quasi spiritual and usually immeasurable thing called a 'soul'.
But it's not an uncommon argument that eventually computing power will reach the stage where the individual synapses, neurons and suchlike of the brain will be able to be mapped into electronic ones and zeros in silicon (or diamond or whatever we happen to be using by that stage) and lo and behold we'll have the equivalent of the human brain in machine form. At this stage the apocalypse is usually a common projection for what is likely to follow. This could beg the question then, "Why do we bother making things that in all likelihood will rise up and kill us.". Common argument against this is that of all technological items humans excel the best at finding ways of killing each other.
So where and I going this time? As a code monkey programmed responses are something I work with a lot, when I write programs I expect input A process B output C for given values of A and C. Process B determines output C based on A, at least if the program is working.
We work like this too, we are after all a multi-complex of responses, decisions and computations all working at levels we don't really understand yet but every now and then I catch one of these and realise my current line of code, like an interrupt watching the main thread of code as it pauses.
This morning I had a pause as I was buying my daily pint o' milk (semi skimmed, lactose fans). The price was 30p, I handed over 30p. They took my coins and thanked me. I waited. She woke me up with "Did you want a receipt?" because I was waiting for change. I'm too used to receiving chance for everything to carry on automatically after handing over the exact amount.
Just one cycle in my code sequences. Next week I map my brain into class diagrams and find out every thought process inherits from the superclass "sugar".
1 Lets not get too sidetracked here...
But it's not an uncommon argument that eventually computing power will reach the stage where the individual synapses, neurons and suchlike of the brain will be able to be mapped into electronic ones and zeros in silicon (or diamond or whatever we happen to be using by that stage) and lo and behold we'll have the equivalent of the human brain in machine form. At this stage the apocalypse is usually a common projection for what is likely to follow. This could beg the question then, "Why do we bother making things that in all likelihood will rise up and kill us.". Common argument against this is that of all technological items humans excel the best at finding ways of killing each other.
So where and I going this time? As a code monkey programmed responses are something I work with a lot, when I write programs I expect input A process B output C for given values of A and C. Process B determines output C based on A, at least if the program is working.
We work like this too, we are after all a multi-complex of responses, decisions and computations all working at levels we don't really understand yet but every now and then I catch one of these and realise my current line of code, like an interrupt watching the main thread of code as it pauses.
This morning I had a pause as I was buying my daily pint o' milk (semi skimmed, lactose fans). The price was 30p, I handed over 30p. They took my coins and thanked me. I waited. She woke me up with "Did you want a receipt?" because I was waiting for change. I'm too used to receiving chance for everything to carry on automatically after handing over the exact amount.
Just one cycle in my code sequences. Next week I map my brain into class diagrams and find out every thought process inherits from the superclass "sugar".
1 Lets not get too sidetracked here...
no subject
Well, if that's so then in principle it could be included, or else (I'd guess) we'd have something that simulated an intelligence that was quite (but not exactly) human-like.
I've not heard of Charlie Stross, any recommendations on anything to start on?
His website would be as good a start as anywhere. He has three novels and a collection out on paper, and another novel or maybe two(!) by the end of the year.
no subject
Aye, that's the logical response to that. If you can map one system to silicon, you could map another.
(but not exactly) human-like.
Voigt-Kampff time perhaps...
~weblink~
Cheers, it seems more I ponder about things the more I should start reading from people I've never heard about before.